Cascio, Jamais. Fast Company. 17 June 2009. 2 12 2010
This article discusses the possibilities of social networking, specifically Twitter, to be used to help perpetrate genocide under the right conditions. I will use it in my paper to demonstrate the power that social media can hold and how, possibly, horrific the outcome could be
Heussner, Ki Mae. ABC News/ Technology. 15 January 2010. 2 12 2010
This article talks about the different twitter hoaxes that have been perpetrated over the last few years. It shows real world scenarios that show how misinformation through media like Twitter can cause panic and the spread if said misinformation
Johns, Adrian. "The Book of Nature and the Nature of the Book." The Book History Reader. Routledge, 2006. 255-272.
In this book Johns talks about the history of fixity throughout the print age and how the printing press increased fixity and helped establish the credit of the author. I'm going to use this chapter to contrast how the print revolution helped establish fixity and credit while the digital one is seeming to do the opposite in some cases.
Pierson, Garrett. Social Media Vision . 8 January 2009. 2 12 2010
Garrett uses this article to shed some light on the etiquette of "retweeting" and how people can use it to their own gain. I'm going to use this article to show how easy it is to steal other people's ideas and also how easy it is to modify a retweat to sneak in your own link.
Schofield, James. Technology Blog. 12 June 2009. 2 12 2010
Schofield's article talks about how twitter is trying to combat fake celebrity profiles and some of the backlash caused by some of these fake celebrities. This article will help me further show what a person can do when there is no proof of credit, that is, no proof that the real celebrity is writing said tweets.
Stengel, Richard. "Technology and Culture." Time 15 June 2009.
Stengel's article discusses the cultural changes that things like twitter has brought about. He also argues that the phrase "the medium is the message" holds true in twitter. I'm going to use this article to demonstrate the popularity and power that twitter is gaining.
"Twitter power // Learning from ourselves, in real time." USA Today 25 May 2010: 01a.
This article goes into more depth into the power that twitter is gaining as a distributor of media despite its limited character content. It talks about the good that twitter can do, citing the Haiti relief efforts that were organized through social media like twitter. I'll use this article to show that while fixity might be on the decline, it might not be a bad thing
Yates, S and T Summner. "Digital Genres and the New Burden of Fixity." IEEE (1997).
Yates and Summner's article might be a little more dated then the rest of them, but it gives us a great insight into how the idea that media should be fixed is a a little out dated in the digital world. I'm going to use this article to show that media is migrating away from needing to have fixity.
I like this a lot, but with a little tweak. Instead of saying the very general (essentially) "argh! Twitter bad for this stuff!" first just provide a solid foundation of the notions of fixity and credit (from Johns, like you note) and most importantly _how those ideas were important to or were complicated in the progression of print_ and then go forth with those good examples of questionable fixity and questionable credit with regard to twitter. Ultimately, what you'll end up with is not an argument about disaster striking, but a _parallel_ that you can use to make a clear statement about something specifically wrong (and you might not know what that is until you finish writing, in which case just go back and edit!).
ReplyDelete